477-6-16

<p>R. Rosenthal and K. L. Fode, »The Effect of Experimenter Bias on the Performance of the Albino Rat,» unpublished manuscript (Cambridge: Harvard University, 1960); R. Rosenthal and R. Lawson, »A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Experimenter Bias on the Operant Learning of Laboratory Rats,» unpublished manuscript (Cambridge: Harvard University, 1961).</p>

477-6-15

<p>R. Rosenthal and L. Jacobson, Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupil's Intellectual Development (New York: Holt, Rinehart &amp; Winston, 1968); R. Rosenthal, Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research (New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1966).</p>

477-6-12

<p>F. Barron and T. Leary, »Changes in Psychoneurotic Patients with and without Psychotherapy,» Journal of Consulting Psychology 19 (1955): 239-245; A. E. Bregin, »The Effects of Psychotherapy: Negative Results Revisited,» Journal of Consulting Psychology 10 (1963): 244-250; R. D. Cartwright and J. L. Vogel, »A Comparison of Changes in Psychoneurotic Patients during Matched Periods of Therapy and No-Therapy,» Journal of Consulting Psychology 24 (1960): 121-127; E. Powers and H. Witmer, An Experiment in the Prevention of Delinquency (New York: Columbia University Press, 1951); C. B.

477-6-10

<p>It should be noted that psychologists have been as quick to assert absolute truths about the nature of homosexuality as they have about the nature of women. The arguments presented in this essay apply equally to the nature of homosexuality; psychologists know nothing about it; there is no more evidence for the »naturalness» of heterosexuality than for the »naturalness» of homosexuality. Psychology has functioned as a pseudoscien-tific buttress for our cultural sex-role notions, that is, as a buttress for patriarchal ideology and patriarchal social organization.

477-6-9

<p>K. B. Little and E. S. Schneidman, »Congruences among Interpretations of Psychological and Anamnestic Data,» Psychological Monographs 73 (1959): 1-42.</p>

Seiten